The Syracuse Campaign: Failed Opportunities, Failed Leadership
Authors: J. D. Dowdy; ARMY
WAR COLL CARLISLE BARRACKS PA
Abstract: This campaign analysis examines
the role of strategic leadership in the failure of the Athenians during the
Peloponnesian War. The development of a successful strategy relies on a clear
understanding of the objectives and includes an accurate assessment of one's
resources and weaknesses and those of one's enemies. Ultimately, strategy must
aspire to employ one's strength against an opponent's weaknesses, make use of
the experiences of the past, and adjust to the changes of the prevailing
conditions, both materially and psychological. Those involved in making
strategy, be they statesman or military leaders, live in a world of incomplete
information. They do not know how an adversary will act or react, nor do they
understand completely the numerous factors that will affect one's strategic
performance. To secure the desired strategic result from the strategy chosen
requires leadership.
Leadership is the common thread that binds a nation, its
resources, when it chooses war as its course of action. The Athenian adventure
in Sicily is the most notable
among many instances of strategic miscalculation, which led to her loss of
empire. She possessed the power to negotiate from strength and shape the
environment to her advantage. However, she chose a course of imperialistic
conquest that in the end led to the destruction of her military forces.
Athenian defeat can be attributed to a lack of leadership. The cost of this
failure was the loss of her empire and the relegation to the dustbin of history.
Well, those that don't study history are doomed to repeat it.
At first, I thought you were just horsing around. Then I realized, it was probably a different war. (Trojan Horse)
Posted by: Lynda | 05/03/2007 at 10:21 AM
Groan!
Posted by: Rowan | 05/03/2007 at 01:38 PM